Tolerancia a sequía y rendimiento de grano de híbridos de sorgo

Authors

  • Jorge Elizondo-Barrón Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Campo Experimental Río Bravo, 88900, Río Bravo, Tamaulipas, México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8828-6768
  • Ulises Aranda-Lara Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Campo Experimental Río Bravo, 88900, Río Bravo, Tamaulipas, México https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2885-5599
  • Héctor Williams-Alanis Ex-Investigador. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP). Campo Experimental Río Bravo, 88900, Río Bravo, Tamaulipas, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7342-4723

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59741/agri.v3i1.14

Keywords:

Sorghum bicolor; Stress; Selection indexes

Abstract

In the State of Tamaulipas, Mexico, sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is planted annually on 1.0 million hectares, mainly under rainfed conditions with low yields due to drought. To identify sorghum hybrids with high grain yield under two soil moisture conditions, a trial with 34 sorghum hybrids was established at the INIFAP-Rio Bravo Tamaulipas Experimental Station, during the 2021/2022 autumn-winter cycle. Two edaphic moisture conditions were compared: Irrigation and simulated rainfed (pre-planting irrigation). The experimental design was a randomized complete block with three replications, in split plot; the large plot for soil moisture conditions and the subplot for hybrids. Grain yield was used to calculate: Drought susceptibility index (S), yield differential (Dif Rend), arithmetic mean (Media arit), geometric mean (Media geom) and relative efficiency index (IER). The analysis of variance revealed a significant effect between edaphic moisture conditions (21.27 % less grain yield in simulated rainfed) and a significant effect between hybrids. Hybrids with adaptation to simulated rainfed (RB248A*RB133 and RB-3030) and hybrids with high performance in both edaphic humidity conditions (RB248A*RB133 and SBA25*RB256), were identified.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blum, A., G. Golan y J. Mayer (1991). Progress achieved by breeding open-pollinated cultivars as compared with landraces of sorghum. Crops and Soils 117: 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600067034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600067034

Fischer R. A. and Maurer R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29(5) 897 - 912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897

Galicia J. M., Sinagawa G. S., Gutiérrez D. A., Williams A. H., Zavala G. F. (2020). Termotolerancia en líneas de sorgo [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] para grano. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 221-227. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v11i1.1945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v11i1.1945

Golabadi M., Arzani A. and Maibody M. (2006). Assessment of drought tolerance in segregating populations in durum wheat. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 1(5) 162 -171.

Gorman A. O. I. (2015).Precipitation extremes under climate change. Current climate change reports. 1(2):49-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0009-3

Graham R. D. 1984. Breeding for nutritional characteristics in cereals. Adv. Plant Nutr. 1: 57-102.

López S. E., Tosquy V. O. H., Ugalde A. F. J., Acosta G. J. A. (2008). Rendimiento y tolerancia a sequía de genotipos de frijol negro en el estado de Veracruz. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 31(3): 35-39. https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2008.Especial_3.35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2008.Especial_3.35

Menezes, C. B., Ticona B. C. A., Tardin F. D., Cardoso M.J., Bastos E. A., Nogueira D. W., Portugal A. E., Santos C. V., Schaffert R. E. (2014). Selection indices to identify drought-tolerant grain sorghum cultivars. Genetics and Molecular Research 13 (4): 9817-9827. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1001445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.November.27.9

Myo T. A. M. (2011). Physiological responses of selected soybean cultivars [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] under different water regimes. Ph. D. Thesis. Kasetsart University, Thailand. 157 p.

Plenecassagne A., Romero F. E. y López B. C. (1997). Manual de laboratorio, análisis de suelos, aguas, plantas. 173 p.

Rosielle A. A. and Hamblin J. (1981). Theoretical Aspects of Selection for Yield in Stress and Non-Stress Environment 1. Crop Science 21(6) 943 – 646. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x

Salinas G. J. R., Alvarado C. M. y Sánchez de la C. R. 2006. Suelo y Agua, pp. 147-162. En: Rodríguez del B. L. A. (ed.), Campo Experimental Río Bravo: 50 años de investigación agropecuaria en el norte de Tamaulipas, historia, logros y retos. Libro técnico No. 1. INIFAP, Campo Experimental Río Bravo. Río Bravo, Tam., México, 325 p.

Samper C. and Adams M.W. (1985). Geometric mean of stress and control yield as a selection criterion for drought tolerance. Annual Report of Bean Improvement Cooperative 28: 53-54.

SAS Institute. (2016). SAS/STAT® 9.1 User'S Guide. Cary, NC: SAS lnstitute lnc. USA. 5121 p.

SIAP Servicio de información agroalimentaria y pesquera. (2022). Resumen nacional de la producción agrícola. Cultivo de sorgo para grano. Consultado: Octubre 2022. Disponible en https://www.siap.gob.mx

Talebi R., Fayaz F., Naji A. M. (2009).Effective selection criteria for assessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf). Gen. Appl. Plant Physiol. 35: 64-74. https://www.bio21.bas.bg/ipp/gapbfiles

Talebi R., Baghebani N., Karami E, Ensafi M. H. (2011). Defining selection índices for drought tolerance in chickpea under terminal drought stresses. J. Appl. Biol. Sci. 5: 38.

Valdés L., C.G.S. y A. Flores N. (2009). Formación de líneas de sorgo tolerantes a sequía para la sostenibilidad de los agroecosistemas Norestenses. Agricultura Sostenible Vol. 6. Libro de Memoria. X Simposio Internacional y V Congreso Nacional de Agricultura Sostenible. Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, México.

V. B. Rajendra Prasad, Mahalingam Govindaraj, Maduraimuthu Djanaguiraman, Ivica Djalovic, Anjali Shailani, Nishtha Rawat, Sneh Lata Singla-Pareek, Ashwani Pareek and P. V. Vara Prasad. 2021. Drought and High Temperature Stress in Sorghum: Physiological, Genetic, and Molecular Insights and Breeding Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22(18), 9826; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189826

Williams A. H., Aranda L. U., Arcos C. G., Zavala G. F., Rodríguez V. M. del C., Olivares S. E. (2021). Potencial productivo de variedades experimentales de sorgo blanco para el sur de Tamaulipas. Nova Scientia. 13(26): 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v13i26.2688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v13i26.2688

Williams A. H., Aranda L. U., Arcos C. G., Zavala G. F., Galicia J. M., Rodríguez V. M. del C., Elizondo B. J. (2022). Line x tester analysis to estimate combining ability in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Rev. FCA UNCuyo 54(2): 12-21. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.078

Williams, A. H.; Pecina, Q. V.; Zavala, G. F.; Montes, G. N. 2004. RB-Patrón, nuevo híbrido de sorgo para grano en el noreste de México. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 27(3): 291-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2004.3.291

Zarco P.E., González H. V. A., López P. M. C. y Salinas M. Y. (2005). Marcadores fisiológicos de la tolerancia a sequía en maíz (Zea mays L.). Agrociencia. 39 (5) 517-528.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-22

How to Cite

Tolerancia a sequía y rendimiento de grano de híbridos de sorgo. (2024). Universitas Agri, 3(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.59741/agri.v3i1.14

PLUM Metrics